Zum Inhalt
Zur Navigation

Sociolinguistics Symposium 19: Language and the City

Sociolinguistics Symposium 19

Freie Universität Berlin | August 21-24, 2012

Programme: accepted abstracts

Search for abstracts


Abstract ID: 800

Part of Session 122: In the Shadow of Empire (Other abstracts in this session)

Ireland’s Regenerative Challenge: Language Legislation, Regulation and Amalgamation?

Authors: Ó Flatharta, Peadar (1); Williams, Colin H (2)
Submitted by: Ó Flatharta, Peadar (Dublin City University, Ireland)

 

Ireland’s Regenerative Challenge: Language Legislation, Regulation and Amalgamation?

 

Dr Peadar Ó Flatharta  & Professor Colin H Williams

Dublin City University (Ireland) &  Cardiff University (UK).

 

The Irish language is recognised in the Constitution as the national first official language and provisions to support the language are to be found in 160 specific provisions in Irish legislation. In 2003 the President of Ireland signed The Official Languages Act 2003 into law following passage through both Houses of the Parliament. The Act is organised under 5 main parts: Part 1 Sections 1-4 Introduction and Definitions; Part 2 Sections 5-8 Houses of the Oireachtas (Parliament), Acts of the Oireachtas, the Courts; Part 3 Sections 11-18 Language Schemes; Part 4 Sections 20-30 The Language commissioner; Part 5 Sections 31-35 Placenames.

The Act was amended twice in 2011.

The Programme for Government, “Government for National Recovery,” announced a   review of the Language Act…“to ensure expenditure on the language is best targeted towards the development of the language ...and that obligations are imposed in response to demands from citizens.” This review was started by the Minister on 03/11/2011.

The Department of Public Expenditure and Reform announced that the Government had decided to “merge the functions of Language Commissioner with Ombudsman Office. To be progressed in the context of the ongoing review of the Official Languages Act 2003. (17/11/2011).

This paper will:

-review the evidence as to the strengths and weaknesses of the Language Act since enactment in 2003 paying particular attention to the Language Schemes;

-examine the work of An Coimisinéir Teanga;

-examine and evaluate the review process of the Department of Arts Culture and Gaeltacht;

-review the implications for the delivery of public services in the Irish language and the policy issues rising from the proposed transfer of functions of the Language Commissioner;

-critically review “Language Schemes” as a vehicle for service delivery based on the evidence from Ireland and to a lesser degree from other analogous cases, most notably Scotland and Wales.          

© 2012, FU Berlin  |  Feedback
Last modified: 2022/6/8